• be_ixf; php_sdk; php_sdk_1.4.11
  • 33 ms
  • iy_2023; im_12; id_02; ih_04; imh_00; i_epoch:1.70151845528E+12
  • ixf-compiler; ixf-compiler_1.0.0.0
  • py_2018; pm_11; pd_14; ph_12; pmh_14; p_epoch:1.54222645072E+12
  • link-block; link-block_link-block; bodystr
  • pn_tstr:Wed Nov 14 12:14:10 PST 2018; pn_epoch:1.54222645072E+12
  • 0 ms
  • be_ixf; php_sdk; php_sdk_1.4.11
  • https://www.naes.com/news/prc-027-1-the-standard-of-options/
  • https://www.naes.com/news/prc-027-1-the-standard-of-options/
Skip to content
NAES
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Services
    • Power Services
    • Compliance & Fleet Services
      • Engineering
      • E3 Consulting
      • O&M Services
      • Regulatory Compliance Services
      • Maximo Services
      • Field Engineering and Research
    • Fabrication, Maintenance, & Construction
    • Staffing Services
  • About Us
    • Subsidiaries
    • Leadership
  • Communications
    • News
    • Case Studies
    • Press Releases
  • Careers
  • Contact
    • Contact a Location
    • NAES Login Center
Solar Panels

In the News

Home Communications In the News PRC-027-1: The Standard of “Options”

1.14.2019

PRC-027-1: The Standard of “Options”

By John Schmoker, Compliance Testing Services Project Manager

In somewhat of a departure from tradition, NERC’s most recently adopted protection and control standard, PRC-027-1, gives entities additional flexibility for establishing compliance. As is always the case however, multiple compliance options can result in unintended complexity and debate. Such is the case with PRC-027, but to better understand the issues – a little background first.

PRC-027 phases out parts of the retiring PRC-001-1.1(ii) requiring entities to “coordinate” all protective system changes. As many know, PRC-001 was vague at best and did not require entities to follow any specific process when making changes to protective devices. The new Standard requires entities to both define (R1) and follow (R3) a specific protection system coordination process. The process must include several criteria, most of which involve internal and external reviews, communication/coordination with electrically joined entities, and implementation of proposed changes. These aspects of the Standard are straightforward and leave little for debate.

In contrast, Requirement R2 introduces options that can drastically affect both the implementation timing and actions necessary for compliance. Initially, the options appear simple:

  • Perform a Protection System Coordination Study (PSCS) every 6 years
  • Compare present fault current data to a baseline fault current and only perform a PSCS if the difference is 15% (6-year cycle)
  • A combination of both Options 1 & 2

Many Transmission Owners perform coordination studies on an ongoing basis, so Option 3 is the natural choice for those entities without the need for exhaustive investigation. However, Generator Owners (GO) may not have such a straightforward decision. For many GOs, coordination studies are typically performed during unit commissioning or major equipment upgrades and are therefore not maintained in the manner R2 dictates. At the plant level, the results of a PSCS will not change drastically over time as the equipment and protective settings are fixed until the equipment fails or becomes obsolete. Option 2 then becomes the logical choice for plants to prevent the need for expensive recurring coordination studies. At first glance, Option 2 allows entities to perform a simple comparison of available fault current to an established “baseline”. This equates to a short circuit analysis in lieu of a full PSCS, which is inevitably less expensive and can be completed using internal resources in many cases.

While Option 2 may lessen the long-term burden on GOs, it’s unfortunately not as simple as it appears. The debate and complexity rests in the phrase “established fault current baseline” and the accompanying relevant footnote within the Standard. The footnote essentially states that a PSCS must be completed to establish a fault current baseline. If that is indeed the case, entities which plan to use Option 2 are required to complete the PSCS and establish a baseline fault current by the Standard’s implementation date of October 1, 2020. While this strategy yields less expense over time, the scope of work and associated cost must be planned for in the near-term. Alternatively, if Option 1 is chosen, the first PSCS is not required for an additional six years (October 1, 2026), which can provide a welcomed short-term financial buffer. In either case an initial PSCS must be completed if not already available.

In summary, multiple options introduce added complexity. It will be imperative for entities to review their internal processes and make informed decisions balancing short-term compliance goals and long-term financial efficiencies in their pursuit of compliance with NERC’s new PRC standard.

Join the Conversation

  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
NAES

© Copyright 2023 NAES. All rights reserved.

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Do Not Sell My Personal Information

Website design by Jordan Crown

  • Services
    • Power Services
    • Compliance & Fleet Services
      • Engineering
      • E3 Consulting
      • O&M Services
      • Regulatory Compliance Services
      • Maximo Services
      • Field Engineering and Research
    • Fabrication, Maintenance, & Construction
    • Staffing Services
  • About Us
    • Subsidiaries
    • Leadership
  • Communications
    • News
    • Case Studies
    • Press Releases
  • Careers
  • Contact
    • Contact a Location
    • NAES Login Center

‹ › ×
    Manage Cookie Consent
    We use cookies to optimize our website and our service.
    Functional cookies Always active
    The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
    Preferences
    The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
    Statistics
    The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
    Marketing
    The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
    Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
    View preferences
    {title} {title} {title}
    CAISO Generator Modeling Process and Data Requirements

    Don’t wait until the last minute. You should allow time for at least one iteration with CAISO so that you are complete and deemed compliant before your deadline.

    On August 1, 2018, CAISO introduced a revised Business Practice Manual for Transmission Planning Process (BPM), which includes new data requirements for interconnected generation resources within the ISO’s footprint. Section 10 of the BPM establishes revised data requirements and compliance procedures for all participating generators including non-NERC registered entities. While additional requirements have been placed on larger NERC registered facilities, these changes may pose an even greater burden to entities that have been exempt from NERC mandated modeling and protection requirements.

    New data requirements include voltage and frequency protection models, power flow models, and in some cases, sub-synchronous resonance models. These models must be verified using criteria listed in the BPM, which can only be performed by entities with modeling software and knowledge of modeling practices.

    NAES is prepared to assist entities with data aggregation, modeling, and testing to ensure compliance with CAISO’s data requests. The following links will allow entities to determine when to expect their individual data requests (phase) and what data will be required (category).

    Business Practice Manual (BPM)

    Entity Category and Phase Listing

    CAISO Transmission Planning Website

    TPL-007

    TPL-007 establishes planning criteria for induced currents caused by geomagnetic disturbances. The standard is applicable to facilities using transformer(s) with a high side, wye grounded winding operated above 200 kV and can require both submittal of general geomagnetic data (R2) and thermal impact assessments (R6) depending on results of Planning Coordinator analysis.

    VOLTAGE AND REACTIVE (VAR) STANDARDS

    VAR-501-WECC

    VAR-501-WECC requires applicable entities within the WECC region to confirm performance settings and characteristics of Power System Stabilizers (PSS). NAES provides physical testing and reporting services to address WECC’s specific PSS requirements.

    PERSONNEL PERFORMANCE, TRAINING AND QUALIFICATIONS

    PER-006

    PER-006 requires Generator Operators to provide training to personnel who are responsible for the Real-time control of a generator. NAES has developed specific protection system training materials suitable for compliance with the Standard and provides this training both on and off site

    PROTECTION AND CONTROL (PRC) STANDARDS

    PRC-001

    PRC-001 requires entities to coordinate protection system changes with other affected parties. NAES offers both procedural documentation and engineering services to establish the required coordination for both PRC-001 and PRC-027.

    PRC-002

    PRC-002 requires the installation and operation of disturbance monitoring equipment (DME) for applicable entities. NAES can assist with the design and installation of DME as well as ongoing compliance support.

    PRC-019

    PRC-019 requires applicable entities to show coordination between voltage regulating controls, limiters, equipment capabilities, and protection settings. NAES produces PRC-019 specific coordination studies for both traditional generators and renewable projects to establish compliance with the Standard.

    PRC-023

    PRC-023 requires load responsive protective relays be set according to criteria within the Standard to ensure settings do not limit transmission loadability. NAES provides full engineering analyses to maintain compliance with this Standard.

    PRC-024

    PRC-024 requires applicable entities to ensure generator protective relays do not trip within predefined frequency and voltage limits. NAES can complete protection settings analyses and provide compliance documentation that clearly identifies protection settings as they relate to NERC’s “no trip” zones.

    PRC-025

    PRC-025 establishes minimum settings requirements for load-responsive relays protecting generators, step up transformers, and auxiliary transformers. NAES utilizes predefined calculation options as well as simulations to determine a facility’s compliance status and development of new relay settings if required.

    PRC-026

    PRC-026 requires applicable entities to perform load responsive relay settings analyses based on criteria identified within the Standard. Entities are typically notified by the Planning Coordinator when an analysis is required. NAES performs all required studies to establish compliance.

    MODELING, DATA, AND ANALYSIS (MOD) STANDARDS

    MOD-025

    MOD-025 requires Real and Reactive Power capability testing for individual generating units over 20 MVA or facilities with over 75 MVA of generation capacity. NAES offers site specific test procedures and/or complete onsite testing services to meet the requirements of this standard.

    MOD-026

    MOD-026 requires verification of excitation or volt/var control dynamic models through utilization of either system disturbances or physical testing. NAES offers full testing and modeling services to meet the requirements of this standard.

    MOD-027

    MOD-027 requires verification of governor or active power/frequency control dynamic models through utilization of either system disturbances or physical testing. NAES offers full testing and modeling services to meet the requirements of this standard.