• be_ixf; php_sdk; php_sdk_1.4.11
  • 34 ms
  • iy_2023; im_12; id_02; ih_03; imh_20; i_epoch:1.70151601741E+12
  • ixf-compiler; ixf-compiler_1.0.0.0
  • py_2018; pm_11; pd_14; ph_12; pmh_14; p_epoch:1.54222645072E+12
  • link-block; link-block_link-block; bodystr
  • pn_tstr:Wed Nov 14 12:14:10 PST 2018; pn_epoch:1.54222645072E+12
  • 0 ms
  • be_ixf; php_sdk; php_sdk_1.4.11
  • https://www.naes.com/news/changes-coming-in-the-west/
  • https://www.naes.com/news/changes-coming-in-the-west/
Skip to content
NAES
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Services
    • Power Services
    • Compliance & Fleet Services
      • Engineering
      • E3 Consulting
      • O&M Services
      • Regulatory Compliance Services
      • Maximo Services
      • Field Engineering and Research
    • Fabrication, Maintenance, & Construction
    • Staffing Services
  • About Us
    • Subsidiaries
    • Leadership
  • Communications
    • News
    • Case Studies
    • Press Releases
  • Careers
  • Contact
    • Contact a Location
    • NAES Login Center
Solar Panels

In the News

Home Communications In the News Changes Coming in the West!

3.2.2018

Changes Coming in the West!

By Alan Bull, General Manager, Compliance Services 

With the California Independent System Operator’s (CAISO) announcement on January 2, 2018 that it plans to withdraw from Peak Reliability (Peak), effective September 2019, in order to become its own Reliability Coordinator (RC), changes are coming throughout the Western Interconnection.  In addition to the CAISO’s announcement, Peak and PJM Connext have unveiled new details about their plan to create a new market in the West and are imploring potential customers to give them more time to flesh out their proposal before withdrawing from Peak in order to seek RC services elsewhere.

“We know there is a lot of fear, uncertainty, and doubt out there in that people believe that they have to make a decision in the next few weeks about our RC services,” Pete Hoelscher, Peak’s chief strategy officer, said on a conference call  on February 6, 2018. “Our point of view is clearly that is not the case.” So far, the Peak-PJM Connext plan is already winning some praise, both because of the sponsors’ experience with providing reliability and market services and because of the current hurdles to expanding the CAISO as a RC. “What PEAK and PJM have proposed is very appealing.” Scott Miller, the incoming executive director of the Western Power Trading Forum, said Wednesday. “Peak certainly has the reliability function down pat, as well as experience modeling the entire Western Interconnect,” he said, adding, “PJM probably has the most experience in running a large locationally-based market and a centralized dispatch.”

CAISO has stated that it can offer the RC services at a 50-75% discount compared to Peak, and it is urging balancing authorities to sign letters of intent by March 1, 2018 if they are interested in using CAISO’s services. Observers say that CAISO’s January 2 RC announcement set in motion a ticking clock for entities to make a significant decision without complete information – whether to align with markets run by existing grid operators in the Western region, including CAISO, or hold out for a potential new market design floated last year by Peak and PJM Connext.  Since January, Peak and PJM Connext have revealed new details about their proposed market, as well as an ambitious timeline to get portions of the market up and running by 2020. PJM Connext is a wholly owned, non-regulated subsidiary of PJM Interconnection. The initial market offering would include: nodal, locational marginal pricing-based market; real-time and day-ahead energy markets; financial transmission rights; and consolidated credit and market settlement, according to the February 6 call. Additional services, based on stakeholder interest, could include: ancillary services such as regulation and reserves; a demand response construct; and a capacity construct and market. Entities would be able to choose from a menu of services, including Peak’s existing RC services, balancing authority services and market services, Todd Bessemer, PJM managing director for strategic development, added on that February 6 call to interested stakeholders.

“We realize that not everyone is going to be ready for markets at the same time, so our offering is not exclusive,” Bessemer said. “For those who wish to remain in other arrangements such as CAISO’s [Energy Imbalance Market], Peak will continue to provide reliability coordinator services for those who wish to use them,” he said.  Also, rumors persist that both the Mountain West Transmission Group (a collaboration of electricity service providers in that region) and BC Hydro will leave Peak in order to obtain RC services elsewhere.

As demonstrated by the success and failure of other prior Western regional energy initiatives, the path forward for these competing RC and market initiatives may take some significant twists and turns before a clear outcome(s) emerges.  Nonetheless, while these moves may have no immediate impact on generation facilities, if a PJM-style market becomes active in the West, the way in which generation units are dispatched may change substantially.  In addition, the RC entity that generation facilities in the West may need to interact with for compliance purposes and to support reliable operations may change.  Western organizations are encouraged to continue to follow and monitor these potentially significant developments as they continue to evolve.

Join the Conversation

  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
NAES

© Copyright 2023 NAES. All rights reserved.

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Do Not Sell My Personal Information

Website design by Jordan Crown

  • Services
    • Power Services
    • Compliance & Fleet Services
      • Engineering
      • E3 Consulting
      • O&M Services
      • Regulatory Compliance Services
      • Maximo Services
      • Field Engineering and Research
    • Fabrication, Maintenance, & Construction
    • Staffing Services
  • About Us
    • Subsidiaries
    • Leadership
  • Communications
    • News
    • Case Studies
    • Press Releases
  • Careers
  • Contact
    • Contact a Location
    • NAES Login Center

‹ › ×
    Manage Cookie Consent
    We use cookies to optimize our website and our service.
    Functional cookies Always active
    The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
    Preferences
    The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
    Statistics
    The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
    Marketing
    The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
    Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
    View preferences
    {title} {title} {title}
    CAISO Generator Modeling Process and Data Requirements

    Don’t wait until the last minute. You should allow time for at least one iteration with CAISO so that you are complete and deemed compliant before your deadline.

    On August 1, 2018, CAISO introduced a revised Business Practice Manual for Transmission Planning Process (BPM), which includes new data requirements for interconnected generation resources within the ISO’s footprint. Section 10 of the BPM establishes revised data requirements and compliance procedures for all participating generators including non-NERC registered entities. While additional requirements have been placed on larger NERC registered facilities, these changes may pose an even greater burden to entities that have been exempt from NERC mandated modeling and protection requirements.

    New data requirements include voltage and frequency protection models, power flow models, and in some cases, sub-synchronous resonance models. These models must be verified using criteria listed in the BPM, which can only be performed by entities with modeling software and knowledge of modeling practices.

    NAES is prepared to assist entities with data aggregation, modeling, and testing to ensure compliance with CAISO’s data requests. The following links will allow entities to determine when to expect their individual data requests (phase) and what data will be required (category).

    Business Practice Manual (BPM)

    Entity Category and Phase Listing

    CAISO Transmission Planning Website

    TPL-007

    TPL-007 establishes planning criteria for induced currents caused by geomagnetic disturbances. The standard is applicable to facilities using transformer(s) with a high side, wye grounded winding operated above 200 kV and can require both submittal of general geomagnetic data (R2) and thermal impact assessments (R6) depending on results of Planning Coordinator analysis.

    VOLTAGE AND REACTIVE (VAR) STANDARDS

    VAR-501-WECC

    VAR-501-WECC requires applicable entities within the WECC region to confirm performance settings and characteristics of Power System Stabilizers (PSS). NAES provides physical testing and reporting services to address WECC’s specific PSS requirements.

    PERSONNEL PERFORMANCE, TRAINING AND QUALIFICATIONS

    PER-006

    PER-006 requires Generator Operators to provide training to personnel who are responsible for the Real-time control of a generator. NAES has developed specific protection system training materials suitable for compliance with the Standard and provides this training both on and off site

    PROTECTION AND CONTROL (PRC) STANDARDS

    PRC-001

    PRC-001 requires entities to coordinate protection system changes with other affected parties. NAES offers both procedural documentation and engineering services to establish the required coordination for both PRC-001 and PRC-027.

    PRC-002

    PRC-002 requires the installation and operation of disturbance monitoring equipment (DME) for applicable entities. NAES can assist with the design and installation of DME as well as ongoing compliance support.

    PRC-019

    PRC-019 requires applicable entities to show coordination between voltage regulating controls, limiters, equipment capabilities, and protection settings. NAES produces PRC-019 specific coordination studies for both traditional generators and renewable projects to establish compliance with the Standard.

    PRC-023

    PRC-023 requires load responsive protective relays be set according to criteria within the Standard to ensure settings do not limit transmission loadability. NAES provides full engineering analyses to maintain compliance with this Standard.

    PRC-024

    PRC-024 requires applicable entities to ensure generator protective relays do not trip within predefined frequency and voltage limits. NAES can complete protection settings analyses and provide compliance documentation that clearly identifies protection settings as they relate to NERC’s “no trip” zones.

    PRC-025

    PRC-025 establishes minimum settings requirements for load-responsive relays protecting generators, step up transformers, and auxiliary transformers. NAES utilizes predefined calculation options as well as simulations to determine a facility’s compliance status and development of new relay settings if required.

    PRC-026

    PRC-026 requires applicable entities to perform load responsive relay settings analyses based on criteria identified within the Standard. Entities are typically notified by the Planning Coordinator when an analysis is required. NAES performs all required studies to establish compliance.

    MODELING, DATA, AND ANALYSIS (MOD) STANDARDS

    MOD-025

    MOD-025 requires Real and Reactive Power capability testing for individual generating units over 20 MVA or facilities with over 75 MVA of generation capacity. NAES offers site specific test procedures and/or complete onsite testing services to meet the requirements of this standard.

    MOD-026

    MOD-026 requires verification of excitation or volt/var control dynamic models through utilization of either system disturbances or physical testing. NAES offers full testing and modeling services to meet the requirements of this standard.

    MOD-027

    MOD-027 requires verification of governor or active power/frequency control dynamic models through utilization of either system disturbances or physical testing. NAES offers full testing and modeling services to meet the requirements of this standard.