• be_ixf; php_sdk; php_sdk_1.4.11
  • 37 ms
  • iy_2023; im_03; id_22; ih_18; imh_13; i_epoch:1.67953400468E+12
  • ixf-compiler; ixf-compiler_1.0.0.0
  • py_2020; pm_05; pd_14; ph_21; pmh_21; p_epoch:1.5895164604E+12
  • link-block-publisher; link-block-publisher_link-block-publisher; bodystr
  • pn_tstr:Thu May 14 21:21:00 PST 2020; pn_epoch:1.5895164604E+12
  • 0 ms
  • be_ixf; php_sdk; php_sdk_1.4.11
  • https://www.naes.com/locations/minnesota-river-station/
  • https://www.naes.com/locations/minnesota-river-station/
Skip to content
NAES
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Services
    • Power Services
    • Compliance & Fleet Services
      • Engineering
      • E3 Consulting
      • O&M Services
      • Complete Compliance Services
    • Fabrication, Maintenance, & Construction
    • Staffing Services
  • About Us
    • Subsidiaries
    • Leadership
  • Communications
    • News
    • Case Studies
    • Press Releases
  • Careers
  • Contact
    • Careers
    • Contact a Location
    • NAES Login Center

Our Plants

Minnesota River Station

Minnesota River Station

49 MW dual-fuel natural gas and oil plant that consists of an electric generation plant and a distribution substation located in Chaska, Minnesota. The facility sits on seven acres approximately 500 feet from the Minnesota River.

Dry Air Injection System Solves Humidity-Related
Electrical Problem at MMPA Minnesota River

     By Bob Burchfield – Plant Manager, MMPA Minnesota River and Faribault Energy Park

Team photo: MMPA staff who had a hand in this Best of the Best (left to right): Shawn Flake, Justin Herman, Mike Pavek, Plant Manager Bob Burchfield, Steve Gare, Bob Flicek and Bill Schrot.

The Challenge

Two electrical faults occurred on a 13.8 kV bus within a five-year timespan at MMPA’s Minnesota River Power Station (figure 1). In both incidents, the solid copper bus and ductwork sustained extensive damage, resulting in lengthy forced outages. Figure 2 shows the burned red insulator boots at the fault location.

NAES MMPA Figure 1
Figure 1: Normal view of bus section
NAES MMPA Figure 2
Figure 2: Insulator Boots Burned By Electrical fault

During the first incident, the team coordinated with the OEM and determined that the section of bus that faulted didn’t have sufficient duct heaters installed. We installed two new heaters and scheduled more frequent inspections. Five years later, a fault at a different location in the bus required a more extensive investigation and more robust defense. Both events occurred during conditions of extreme humidity with heavy rainfall and dew points above 73° F. A third-party engineering firm determined that the bus was designed for relative humidity of 95 percent. However, relative humidity levels routinely exceed 95 percent during the spring and summer months in our region. The ductwork is vented to atmosphere through small screened holes, exposing the bus to ambient weather conditions.

While making repairs after the second incident, we noticed that the OEM had modified the replacement parts. The red insulating boots now had the tie-wraps at the sides rather than on top (figure 3). Previously, they had allowed moisture accumulated on the upper cover to drip into the seams onto exposed copper bus. The OEM had also modified the metal duct covers to create more overlap, particularly on the corners. After we had completed the repairs with improved OEM parts and added another space heater, the insulation readings still remained below acceptable values. Infrared imagery revealed that the heaters added negligible heat to the actual duct (figure 4). We also noted on new heaters we purchased from the OEM that they had begun installing them inside the duct with minimal clearances from the bus, apparently in an effort to make them more effective.

NAES MMPA figure 3

Figure 3: New style insulating boots with tie-wraps on side
NAES MMPA figure 4
Figure 4: Infrared image of bus duct and space heaters

The Solution

After heating the bus for a prolonged period following repairs, we found that phase-to-ground resistance readings remained below acceptable limits. We then injected dry air overnight using a makeshift regulator and hose, which significantly improved insulation and permitted the bus to be safely energized. Given the success we had with this arrangement, our technicians designed a dry-air supply system for permanent installation and wrote an operating narrative explaining multiple safeguards and interlocks to prevent over-pressure and use of a permanent dry-air injection system to prevent moisture entry. The slight positive pressure created by injecting air, they noted, is an added benefit of the injection system.

We learned from our repair contractor that many sites in our region had experienced similar failures – and that in some cases, they were simply doubling the number of space heaters as a corrective action. However, we eventually ruled out the ‘additional heaters’ option due to the OEM’s new location of space heaters inside the bus with less than four inches’ clearance from the bus and ground. As mentioned, the IR images showed the heaters to be less than effective at increasing temperature inside the duct, even at that proximity.

To be on the safe side, we had the technicians’ proposed air-injection system reviewed by a third-party qualified engineering firm and by our management. Injecting dry air is typically reserved for iso-phase bus ducts, so there were concerns about applying this solution to a non-segregated bus duct – especially since non-segregated bus covers are fastened with screws and not necessarily designed for positive pressure. Iso-phase bus ducting, on the other hand, generally is constructed of welded tube with only one conductor per duct.

In their narrative, the technicians explained how they would set equal flow to each injection point using instrument throttling valves and a flow meter to measure the incremental air-flow increase at each injection point (figure 5). At the same time, they confirmed low pressure with sufficient air flow by observing a small amount of the air exiting the duct from each vent/drain hole.

NAES MMPA figure 5
Figure 5: Stainless steel tubing with throttling valve at each heater box

Our team took a three-pronged approach to prevent water from entering via the supplied-air system:

  • The team recognized that any malfunction of a regenerating dryer tower could allow water to enter the instrument air piping from the air compressors. We didn’t completely trust the installed plant dryer tower, so the technicians proposed adding a tap to the top of the instrument air receiver tank and another dryer tower dedicated solely to the non-segregated bus duct (figure 6).
  • We also procured and installed a dedicated dew-point analyzer that we programmed to shut off the air-supply solenoid at a predetermined set point. The normal dew-point temperature downstream of two dryer towers is very low, so we opted for a conservative shutoff set point of 0° F. Part of our logic in being this conservative was that the dew point remains relatively constant in the new system, so a change of any appreciable amount could indicate a problem.
  • Since the air is injected at each space heater box located below the bottom bus cover, dry air enters the bus duct through perforated holes above the heater. If water reaches this box from the air supply, it has a last chance of removal through the bottom screened hole (figure 7).
NAES MMPA figure 6
Figure 6: Dry air injection and protection equipment
NAES MMPA figure 7
Figure 7: Perforated heater box with air injection tubing penetration

The sheer size of this particular bus factored into our solution. The ducting measures approximately 200 feet long and consists of three different sections. It’s heated by 25 space heaters that are powered by two separate 120V circuits, and each heater draws slightly more than 1 amp. The team also procured and installed a current monitoring device. If any one heater open-circuits, the amp draw will drop by 1 amp (figure 9). If an entire heater circuit trips, the new panel will display a loss of current. We didn’t program an alarm because a thermostat will periodically shut off heaters at 95° F, causing nuisance alarms.

 The Results 

The dry-air injection system has been in place for two years now. During a series of severe storms last year that brought heavy rains, 80-100 mph winds and many days of high relative humidity, we had no arc-tracking and found no evidence of moisture. Phase-to-phase and phase-to-ground insulation resistance readings remain much higher than pre-installation values. A nationally recognized bus contractor wrote a highly favorable letter acknowledging the system’s benefits and the ingenuity of our technicians. We’ll need more time to fully determine the new system’s effectiveness, but if it had not been in operation during last year’s extreme weather, we think it likely that there would’ve been another electrical fault.

NAES MMPA plant photo
Plant photo: MMPA Minnesota River aerial view

 

Details

  • Location Chaska, MN
  • Owner Minnesota Municipal Power
  • Type Simple Cycle
  • Facility Size 49MW
  • NERC Region MRO
Download Project Overview PDF

Join the Conversation

  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
NAES

© Copyright 2023 NAES. All rights reserved.

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Do Not Sell My Personal Information

Website design by Jordan Crown

  • Services
    • Power Services
    • Compliance & Fleet Services
      • Engineering
      • E3 Consulting
      • O&M Services
      • Complete Compliance Services
    • Fabrication, Maintenance, & Construction
    • Staffing Services
  • About Us
    • Subsidiaries
    • Leadership
  • Communications
    • News
    • Case Studies
    • Press Releases
  • Careers
  • Contact
    • Careers
    • Contact a Location
    • NAES Login Center

‹ › ×
    Manage Cookie Consent
    We use cookies to optimize our website and our service.
    Functional cookies Always active
    The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
    Preferences
    The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
    Statistics
    The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
    Marketing
    The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
    Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
    View preferences
    {title} {title} {title}
    CAISO Generator Modeling Process and Data Requirements

    Don’t wait until the last minute. You should allow time for at least one iteration with CAISO so that you are complete and deemed compliant before your deadline.

    On August 1, 2018, CAISO introduced a revised Business Practice Manual for Transmission Planning Process (BPM), which includes new data requirements for interconnected generation resources within the ISO’s footprint. Section 10 of the BPM establishes revised data requirements and compliance procedures for all participating generators including non-NERC registered entities. While additional requirements have been placed on larger NERC registered facilities, these changes may pose an even greater burden to entities that have been exempt from NERC mandated modeling and protection requirements.

    New data requirements include voltage and frequency protection models, power flow models, and in some cases, sub-synchronous resonance models. These models must be verified using criteria listed in the BPM, which can only be performed by entities with modeling software and knowledge of modeling practices.

    NAES is prepared to assist entities with data aggregation, modeling, and testing to ensure compliance with CAISO’s data requests. The following links will allow entities to determine when to expect their individual data requests (phase) and what data will be required (category).

    Business Practice Manual (BPM)

    Entity Category and Phase Listing

    CAISO Transmission Planning Website

    TPL-007

    TPL-007 establishes planning criteria for induced currents caused by geomagnetic disturbances. The standard is applicable to facilities using transformer(s) with a high side, wye grounded winding operated above 200 kV and can require both submittal of general geomagnetic data (R2) and thermal impact assessments (R6) depending on results of Planning Coordinator analysis.

    VOLTAGE AND REACTIVE (VAR) STANDARDS

    VAR-501-WECC

    VAR-501-WECC requires applicable entities within the WECC region to confirm performance settings and characteristics of Power System Stabilizers (PSS). NAES provides physical testing and reporting services to address WECC’s specific PSS requirements.

    PERSONNEL PERFORMANCE, TRAINING AND QUALIFICATIONS

    PER-006

    PER-006 requires Generator Operators to provide training to personnel who are responsible for the Real-time control of a generator. NAES has developed specific protection system training materials suitable for compliance with the Standard and provides this training both on and off site

    PROTECTION AND CONTROL (PRC) STANDARDS

    PRC-001

    PRC-001 requires entities to coordinate protection system changes with other affected parties. NAES offers both procedural documentation and engineering services to establish the required coordination for both PRC-001 and PRC-027.

    PRC-002

    PRC-002 requires the installation and operation of disturbance monitoring equipment (DME) for applicable entities. NAES can assist with the design and installation of DME as well as ongoing compliance support.

    PRC-019

    PRC-019 requires applicable entities to show coordination between voltage regulating controls, limiters, equipment capabilities, and protection settings. NAES produces PRC-019 specific coordination studies for both traditional generators and renewable projects to establish compliance with the Standard.

    PRC-023

    PRC-023 requires load responsive protective relays be set according to criteria within the Standard to ensure settings do not limit transmission loadability. NAES provides full engineering analyses to maintain compliance with this Standard.

    PRC-024

    PRC-024 requires applicable entities to ensure generator protective relays do not trip within predefined frequency and voltage limits. NAES can complete protection settings analyses and provide compliance documentation that clearly identifies protection settings as they relate to NERC’s “no trip” zones.

    PRC-025

    PRC-025 establishes minimum settings requirements for load-responsive relays protecting generators, step up transformers, and auxiliary transformers. NAES utilizes predefined calculation options as well as simulations to determine a facility’s compliance status and development of new relay settings if required.

    PRC-026

    PRC-026 requires applicable entities to perform load responsive relay settings analyses based on criteria identified within the Standard. Entities are typically notified by the Planning Coordinator when an analysis is required. NAES performs all required studies to establish compliance.

    MODELING, DATA, AND ANALYSIS (MOD) STANDARDS

    MOD-025

    MOD-025 requires Real and Reactive Power capability testing for individual generating units over 20 MVA or facilities with over 75 MVA of generation capacity. NAES offers site specific test procedures and/or complete onsite testing services to meet the requirements of this standard.

    MOD-026

    MOD-026 requires verification of excitation or volt/var control dynamic models through utilization of either system disturbances or physical testing. NAES offers full testing and modeling services to meet the requirements of this standard.

    MOD-027

    MOD-027 requires verification of governor or active power/frequency control dynamic models through utilization of either system disturbances or physical testing. NAES offers full testing and modeling services to meet the requirements of this standard.