• be_ixf; php_sdk; php_sdk_1.4.11
  • 19 ms
  • iy_2023; im_03; id_22; ih_18; imh_54; i_epoch:1.67953649544E+12
  • ixf-compiler; ixf-compiler_1.0.0.0
  • py_2020; pm_05; pd_14; ph_21; pmh_21; p_epoch:1.58951646156E+12
  • link-block-publisher; link-block-publisher_link-block-publisher; bodystr
  • pn_tstr:Thu May 14 21:21:01 PST 2020; pn_epoch:1.58951646156E+12
  • 0 ms
  • be_ixf; php_sdk; php_sdk_1.4.11
  • https://www.naes.com/locations/mid-connecticut/
  • https://www.naes.com/locations/mid-connecticut/
Skip to content
NAES
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Services
    • Power Services
    • Compliance & Fleet Services
      • Engineering
      • E3 Consulting
      • O&M Services
      • Complete Compliance Services
    • Fabrication, Maintenance, & Construction
    • Staffing Services
  • About Us
    • Subsidiaries
    • Leadership
  • Communications
    • News
    • Case Studies
    • Press Releases
  • Careers
  • Contact
    • Careers
    • Contact a Location
    • NAES Login Center

Our Plants

Mid-Connecticut

Mid-Connecticut

Mid-Connecticut is a 90 MW – 2,800 tons per day Energy from Waste (EFW) facility in Hartford, CT.

 

NAES delivers dramatic results in safety, cost, reliability at MIRA facility

since naes took over operations, Connecticut’s waste-to-energy facility has seen abrupt improvements in its recordable injury rate, dispatch reliability, cost control and processing rate

 

Connecticut’s Materials Innovation and Recycling Authority (MIRA) facility presents a triple challenge to an operator, in that its three discrete units – a Waste Processing Facility (WPF), a Power Block Facility (PBF) and an auxiliary Jet Turbine Facility (JTF) – each require a separate operating plan.

‘NAES Safe’ Program Turns Things Around
After the takeover, MIRA was averaging about one recordable injury a month. Once the new management had fully implemented the 10 Core Elements of the NAES Safety Management System and trained employees in the principles and practices of ‘NAES Safe,’ the staff operated for nearly two years without a recordable. NAES Safe is based on two premises: Safety is priority one for every employee every day on every task; and zero injuries is the only acceptable safety standard.

“Once they saw us managers consistently making the rounds, participating in weekly safety training, holding regular all-hands meetings to discuss timely safety matters and provide a forum for them to voice concerns, employees started to buy in,” said plant manager John O’Rourke. “They got on board because management had begun ‘walking the talk’ – shutting down the plant when safety concerns warranted it, or delaying the start of the workday to allow attendance at safety training.”

Budget Review Pays Off in Spades
After a careful review of the three previous years’ budgets, the NAES management team put a number of cost-cutting measures into effect. These brought the annual operating budget down from an average of $24 million to $16.1 million, a dramatic 34 percent reduction.

The NAES team took a ‘whole project’ approach in implementing cost-cutting measures:

  • Replaced foam-filled loader tires with solid ones that can be rethreaded to extended service life.
  • Operated the plant five days rather than six days per week, enabled by higher processing rate.
  • Improved maintenance, which reduced downtime and cut repair costs.
  • Assigned staff to perform tasks that had been contracted out, such as dozer operation and power-washing.
  • Reduced staff from 81 to 45 by cutting the third processing shift (thanks to improved processing rate) and eliminating redundant positions.

Abrupt Turnaround in JTF Reliability
The NAES team then turned to another glaring shortfall: the dispatch reliability of the JTF’s four aero-derivative turbines, which were not adequately fulfilling their designated ‘peaker’ role.

At the time of the takeover, NAES engineers had benchmarked the JTF’s reliability at approximately 50 percent. After making a thorough assessment to ensure they fully understood the failure mode, they devised and executed a capital improvement plan in collaboration with MIRA. Today, the JTF turbines are tracking at the highest reliability they’ve ever registered, averaging 95 percent overall based on ISO-NE’s formula.

Last But Not Least: NAES Sets New Waste Processing Records
At MIRA’s Waste Processing Facility, processing rates showed a sharp uptick under NAES management. MIRA has set new records for tons processed per available hour during each of the four years NAES has operated the facility. (See the chart above.)

Details

  • Location
  • Owner Connecticut Resources Recovery Authority
  • Type Municipal Waste
  • Facility Size 90MW
  • NERC Region NPCC
Download Project Overview PDF

Join the Conversation

  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
NAES

© Copyright 2023 NAES. All rights reserved.

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Do Not Sell My Personal Information

Website design by Jordan Crown

  • Services
    • Power Services
    • Compliance & Fleet Services
      • Engineering
      • E3 Consulting
      • O&M Services
      • Complete Compliance Services
    • Fabrication, Maintenance, & Construction
    • Staffing Services
  • About Us
    • Subsidiaries
    • Leadership
  • Communications
    • News
    • Case Studies
    • Press Releases
  • Careers
  • Contact
    • Careers
    • Contact a Location
    • NAES Login Center

‹ › ×
    Manage Cookie Consent
    We use cookies to optimize our website and our service.
    Functional cookies Always active
    The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
    Preferences
    The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
    Statistics
    The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
    Marketing
    The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
    Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
    View preferences
    {title} {title} {title}
    CAISO Generator Modeling Process and Data Requirements

    Don’t wait until the last minute. You should allow time for at least one iteration with CAISO so that you are complete and deemed compliant before your deadline.

    On August 1, 2018, CAISO introduced a revised Business Practice Manual for Transmission Planning Process (BPM), which includes new data requirements for interconnected generation resources within the ISO’s footprint. Section 10 of the BPM establishes revised data requirements and compliance procedures for all participating generators including non-NERC registered entities. While additional requirements have been placed on larger NERC registered facilities, these changes may pose an even greater burden to entities that have been exempt from NERC mandated modeling and protection requirements.

    New data requirements include voltage and frequency protection models, power flow models, and in some cases, sub-synchronous resonance models. These models must be verified using criteria listed in the BPM, which can only be performed by entities with modeling software and knowledge of modeling practices.

    NAES is prepared to assist entities with data aggregation, modeling, and testing to ensure compliance with CAISO’s data requests. The following links will allow entities to determine when to expect their individual data requests (phase) and what data will be required (category).

    Business Practice Manual (BPM)

    Entity Category and Phase Listing

    CAISO Transmission Planning Website

    TPL-007

    TPL-007 establishes planning criteria for induced currents caused by geomagnetic disturbances. The standard is applicable to facilities using transformer(s) with a high side, wye grounded winding operated above 200 kV and can require both submittal of general geomagnetic data (R2) and thermal impact assessments (R6) depending on results of Planning Coordinator analysis.

    VOLTAGE AND REACTIVE (VAR) STANDARDS

    VAR-501-WECC

    VAR-501-WECC requires applicable entities within the WECC region to confirm performance settings and characteristics of Power System Stabilizers (PSS). NAES provides physical testing and reporting services to address WECC’s specific PSS requirements.

    PERSONNEL PERFORMANCE, TRAINING AND QUALIFICATIONS

    PER-006

    PER-006 requires Generator Operators to provide training to personnel who are responsible for the Real-time control of a generator. NAES has developed specific protection system training materials suitable for compliance with the Standard and provides this training both on and off site

    PROTECTION AND CONTROL (PRC) STANDARDS

    PRC-001

    PRC-001 requires entities to coordinate protection system changes with other affected parties. NAES offers both procedural documentation and engineering services to establish the required coordination for both PRC-001 and PRC-027.

    PRC-002

    PRC-002 requires the installation and operation of disturbance monitoring equipment (DME) for applicable entities. NAES can assist with the design and installation of DME as well as ongoing compliance support.

    PRC-019

    PRC-019 requires applicable entities to show coordination between voltage regulating controls, limiters, equipment capabilities, and protection settings. NAES produces PRC-019 specific coordination studies for both traditional generators and renewable projects to establish compliance with the Standard.

    PRC-023

    PRC-023 requires load responsive protective relays be set according to criteria within the Standard to ensure settings do not limit transmission loadability. NAES provides full engineering analyses to maintain compliance with this Standard.

    PRC-024

    PRC-024 requires applicable entities to ensure generator protective relays do not trip within predefined frequency and voltage limits. NAES can complete protection settings analyses and provide compliance documentation that clearly identifies protection settings as they relate to NERC’s “no trip” zones.

    PRC-025

    PRC-025 establishes minimum settings requirements for load-responsive relays protecting generators, step up transformers, and auxiliary transformers. NAES utilizes predefined calculation options as well as simulations to determine a facility’s compliance status and development of new relay settings if required.

    PRC-026

    PRC-026 requires applicable entities to perform load responsive relay settings analyses based on criteria identified within the Standard. Entities are typically notified by the Planning Coordinator when an analysis is required. NAES performs all required studies to establish compliance.

    MODELING, DATA, AND ANALYSIS (MOD) STANDARDS

    MOD-025

    MOD-025 requires Real and Reactive Power capability testing for individual generating units over 20 MVA or facilities with over 75 MVA of generation capacity. NAES offers site specific test procedures and/or complete onsite testing services to meet the requirements of this standard.

    MOD-026

    MOD-026 requires verification of excitation or volt/var control dynamic models through utilization of either system disturbances or physical testing. NAES offers full testing and modeling services to meet the requirements of this standard.

    MOD-027

    MOD-027 requires verification of governor or active power/frequency control dynamic models through utilization of either system disturbances or physical testing. NAES offers full testing and modeling services to meet the requirements of this standard.